Natural born leaders?

The qualities of a good leader

Mr. X is good looking, very intelligent and has a high formal education. Also, he is funny (“ha ha”-funny, not weird-funny) and people like him.

Do you think that Mr. X’s good looks and his degree will help him become a good leader?

Being funny is a desirable leader quality; a good sense of humor can help you create a good working atmosphere and diminish tensions. The other features listed above are not essential and not even necessary as leader qualities.

What is essential?

Empathy is essential. If you want to work with a group you have to be able to understand how its members feel.

Sympathy (compassion) is as important; you want people you lead to be happier and more content with time? If you are a sympathetic person, it will be easier for you to react to their concerns and problems.

Being able to distinguish important from unimportant is a very useful ability. It may be my favorite at times. Doing and reacting upon things in the right order makes your and other’s lives much less complicated, and help you minimize waste.

Personal integrity and reliability are also crucial. I want a leader who does the right thing even when nobody is watching. Someone that keeps his promises and whose words can be trusted. A person with weak personal integrity can not motivate others to truly commit to common goals, since his own commitment may be questionable.

Furthermore – humility; mental robustness; being just and fair; having capacity to come up with and to realize a vision; inspiring and stimulating others – those are qualities a good modern leader needs, they are not only in the “nice to have” domain.

Leadership has many dimensions to it; what I wonder is – can it be learned, or are we born to be leaders?

Got the gene?

Is there such a thing as a “Natural born leader”? There is a study done (maybe several, I am aware of this one; Dr Senior, Aston University), and a link between certain genes and a leadership ability is found.

Transformational leadership is a style where leaders use their charisma, empathy, support, and intellectual stimulation on their team members, in order to motivate them and help them max their potential. That style of leadership is found to co-relate with a certain gene responsible for synthesizing dopamine.

Some people have “the right version” of the gene, some don’t. Those other people (brrrrr…”The Others”) are simply unable to develop efficient charisma and they score low on ability to intellectually stimulate others.

My guess is that people with “the inefficient version of the gene” probably, or just – maybe, would not make either happy or excellent leaders.

Another option is that if The Others get into leader roles, they may just practice Transactional leading style (“Respect my authoritah!!!“, clear chain of command, motivation by reward and punishment…). That leading style is actually the most common one, but definitely not my cup of tea.

Even if we start getting tested for the presence of  “the good gene” as a part of a job interview (which I do not think will ever happen and if it does something went seriously wrong with human kind) – that is only a single gene, and we are very complex organisms, with a few more genes with interesting features.

A leader since the tender age of two?

Whatever the case is; if we get born as such or we develop into small children-leaders thanks to some circumstances in our early life – some of us do show good leading abilities early in life. Already at a very young age there are children that other little ones follow, imitate more than others and do as they are told by them.

Is being a good leader from en early age a desirable feature of an excellent leader? I think it is a plus. All genetics aside; it is an experience, and therefore valuable.

Can someone learn how to be empathic, inspiring, fair, blah blah blah?

Many of us already have at least some of those qualities; they are not all that uncommon. And I guess that everyone can learn about them – what they incorporate, how they manifest themselves etc. A bit of googling and reading would get you well informed. Then comes practice, and that may take some time, depending how you are as a person today.

For example, it seems to be hard to learn how to develop empathy, if one has none or very little as a grown-up. Empathy is a skill we develop in childhood (the ability to be empathic is probably partly innate [ref]), and it is harder to build it up later in life. Still, it is not impossible; there are techniques on how to develop it further (role reversals, play acting…).

Charisma

The level of charisma, personal magnetism, may also be hard to push up (though, in Sims 3 it was pretty easy to practice speech in front of the mirror and earn quite a few charisma points :)).

Some theories are that charisma comes from an inner self-confidence that a person projects onto others. Therefore, if you think you lack charisma, the solution sounds simple to me – work on your self confidence and charisma will come to you! 😉

I believe that all the qualities that make a good leader can be achieved, improved and excelled if one works on that.

There is no universal recipe; it is about improving what you already have and learning the skills you lack.

Conclusion

You definitely do not need a plastic surgery and obtaining various degrees is not essential if you want to be a good leader.

If you want to become a leader or whatever else, the fact of the matter is: even if you lack a good gene or two and your start position in the race is shifted behind compared to others, you still may win.

One of my favorite movies, “Gattaca“, sends a great message “There is no gene for human spirit”.

You do not need a wonder for your wishes to come true and not everything is written in our genes. All that it takes is the will to change for the better. Determination and persistence will take you far.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

Advertisements

4 Responses to Natural born leaders?

  1. PEZ says:

    I think you can lack some genes and still become a good leader. I doubt though that you can become a _great_ leader. That takes both genes, practice and luck. After all, you could have the genes but absorb your influences from the wrong sources.

  2. Jelena says:

    I agree. It is complex. My feeling is that people with drive (talented or not) achieve more than people with talent who do not exploit it.

  3. Tommy says:

    I think you have an easier ride as a leader if you’re at least somewhat attractive, or at least not unattractive. First impressions last… If someone looks weird, smells bad or similar, he or she may be never so good in leadship but people won’t notice until they’ve worked together for a while, while someone attractive will have the groups attention and good spirit from the start.

    For the time after the first weeks I totaly agree that there are far more important qualities I want to see in a leader than looks and education. Education in the wrong hands may rather be harmful, if the leader insists that something should be done in some specific way because they said so in a book.

  4. Jelena says:

    Hi Tommy,

    I read several studies on perception and bias – who are the ones people believe would make good leaders and how those should look like (especially their faces). Men with strong brows and prominent foreheads; women with thin eyebrows, full lips and wide eyes were good candidates for great leaders – believed test subjects. To me it sounds that the same candidates would be singled out as “attractive”, or whatever “alpha”.

    Other studies of actual people with leader positions showed that generally they were somewhat slimmer, taller and more attractive than the average. Also, that there are far more male than female leaders, and a lot of women that held leading position practiced more aggressive, “male” leading style.

    I agree, Tommy, it may be easier with good looks at start. I guess it is in our nature, we react instinctively first, and later we look for substance within.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: